• Dave Foord
  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 1,641 other followers

  • Dave Foords Twitter

    • RT @greenfieldscc: after one loan player for our twos tomorrow @landrcl can anyone help? 5 days ago
    • Looking out the window and reminding my self that we are 3 days away from the ‘middle of summer’ 1 week ago
    • On my way to London, to look at potential of Moodle being used by a client to create a mobile friendly gamified sport development activity. 2 months ago
    • Heading up North, where I will be spending at least a week working on a huge Moodle migration project with a client. 3 months ago
    • RT @CharnwoodPE: 🏃🏻‍♂️🏃🏻‍♀️ - The 3 Charnwood medalist’s from the @dretsport Cross Country Cup! Harry Foord 1st 🥇, Colin Foord 2nd 🥈, and E… 3 months ago
  • Advertisements

Optivote change their price plan for Moodle Integration (because they listened to me)

A few weeks back, I blogged about Optivote’s Moodle Integration and how this could be a very useful feature for people that have Optivote of CPS voting pads already. At the time they had worked out a price plan which was a fixed price regardless of the organisation’s size – which was OK for the big providers, but less good for the smaller ones – and in conversation with the CEO at Optivote I pointed out that this may not be the best way forward.

Well – I am pleased to find out that they have changed their pricing plan in line with my suggestion, so the plan is based on the number of people that will be using it (so doesn’t disadvantage the smaller providers as much). They have also produced a ‘bundle’ plan where you get a 3 year licence for the price of 2. This (again my suggestion) doesn’t just save money, but if there are any future capital bids out there (OK possibly unlikely at the moment, but may happen) then this cost would be considered as capital rather than revenue – so could be bid for in that light.

Optivotes full price plan can be found at

http://www.optivote.co.uk/Default.aspx?Menu=OFM&Page=3

So I hope that my conversation with the CEO at Optivote has helped the education community (a little bit) especially the smaller providers for whom this now becomes a bit more viable.

I will point out here that I have no financial interest in Optivote – so I am not trying to ‘sell’ their system here, but I am aware that there are lots of providers out there with underused sets of voting pads that have been purchased, for whom this integration could improve their use of the voting pads, and improve the use of Moodle.

Advertisements

Using voting pads – for peer review


Voting pads

Originally uploaded by Dave Foord

Voting pads have been around in education for a few years now, and although they are falling out of favour with many at the moment (and similar to other issues – it isn’t the technology that is at fault but the way that it is used – or abused in many cases, which isn’t the fault of the teaching staff, but the lack of staff development time and opportunity for them), I thought that I would share one way that I used such technologies to good effect.

I used to teach sport science, and one unit was a leadership one, where we would be in a sports hall, and as part of the course I would get the learners to lead parts of sessions. After each ‘micro-lead’ we would then reflect and feedback on it. For many years I would ask the other learners what they thought – and being very polite and not wanting to offend, they would always say everything was very good – even though some sessions were clearly awful. I would then step in with my feedback, which often wasn’t as complementary, the effect of this was the learners didn’t take my constructive criticism on board as well as I would have liked.

In my final year of teaching, I changed this and introduced the voting pads. All I needed was my laptop and the bag of pads (I didn’t need or use a projector!) at the end of the micro-lead, we would return to the seating area, everyone would pick up a pad (it didn’t matter which one) – and I would ask them to rate parts of the session that they had just partaken in. People would do this, and as it was anonymous they were very honest, this had a much better effect on the learner who had lead, than me just ploughing in with critiscisms – instead I was able to pick up on the feedback from their peers, and pick out the reasons why, and what to do next time to better effect.

This I think is still a very good use of voting technologies – and it isn’t just for the sports environment, anything where learners have to present, this can be used. Now if we want to take this a step further there are various ways of making use of learners mobiles phones to get similar feedback, but for places that ban phones and have bags of voting pads in cupboards then this is a very good technique. This posting was triggered by reading a blog article on this topic at http://mobile-learning.blog-city.com/the_use_of_an_audience_response_systems_to_provide_peer_feed.htm